This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
1 Harpokr. s.v. στασιώτης (Sauppe, Or. Att. II. p. 138.) “Ἀντιφῶν ἐν τῷ περὶ τῆς μεταστάσεως: περὶ τοίνυν ὧν Ἀπόληξις κατηγόρηκεν ὡς στασιώτης ἦν ἐγὼ καὶ ὁ πάππος ὁ ἐμός: ἔοικε νῦν ὁ ῥήτωρ ἰδίως ἐπὶ τοῦ δορυφόρου κεχρῆσθαι τῷ ὀνόματι: ἐν γοῦν τοῖς ἑξῆς φησιν ὅτι: οὐκ ἂν τοὺς μὲν τυραννοῦντας ἠδυνήθησαν οἱ πρόγονοι κολάσαι, τοὺς δὲ δορυφόρους ἠδυνάτησαν”.Curtius (Hist. Gr. Vol. III. p. 460, transl. Ward) infers from this fragment that Antiphon in his speech argued ‘that the Four Hundred had acted as one equally responsible body, and that, therefore, either all ought to be punished or all acquitted.’ He observes that ‘reference seems to be made to an unjustifiable separation of the parties involved: this is indicated by the distinction drawn between the τύραννοι and the δορυφόροι.’ It is very likely that Antiphon may have used this argument: but I do not see how it is to be inferred from the fragments of the speech περὶ τῆς μεταστάσεως that he used it. The distinction between the τύραννοι and the δορυφόροι is made, as a perusal of the fragment will show, solely in reference to the Peisistratidae.
3 [Plut.] Vitt. X. Oratt.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.