This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
ὡς—ἐν κεφαλαίῳ εἰπεῖν For this absolute use of the Inf, especially with ὡς, cf. 32 § 13 ὡς εἰπεῖν ἐν κεφ., 11 § 2 ὡς ἁπλῶς εἰπεῖν, and other examples in Rehdantz, Index ii, s. v. Infinitiv 3. S.] οὐχ ἵνα κ.τ.λ. Boeotus would say that it was done merely to secure the dower of my mother, he having before evaded payment on the plea of having another name, § 18. This is why the subjunctive is used, and not λάβοιμι, referring only to the past intention. καλῆται ‘That the defendant may go on being called Boeotus.’
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.