εἰς χρήματα...πολιτικὰς. The reasons for
which Hug, after Hirschig and others, rejects these words—as (1) superfluous
for the sense, and (2) spoiling the responsion of the clauses ἐάν τε καρτερήσῃ and ἄν
τε...καταφρονήσῃ—are not convincing. This is the only ex. of
διάπραξις, actio, cited by
L. and S.
ἔστι γὰρ
κτλ. Hug, objecting to the “ganz
unerträgliche Anakoluthie,” follows Vermehren in excising the
clause ἔστι...νόμος, as a gloss on the following
νενόμισται, and writing ὡς
γὰρ for ὥσπερ. This is too rash. For
the sense, cp. 183 B and the passage from Isocr.
Hel. 219 B there quoted.
ἦν...εἶναι. For simple ἦν (ἔστι) with accus. and
infin. cp. Phaedo 72 D
ἀλλ᾽ ἔστι τῷ ὄντι...τὰς τῶν τεθνεώτων ψυχὰς
εἶναι. For ἐθέλων as adj.
(“volun tarily”) in prose, cp. Xen.
Anab. VI. 2. 6; Lys. XIX. 6: in poetry the use is common, e.g. Soph. O. T. 649.
This text is part of:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.