καὶ ἐν Λακεδαίμονι. I follow Winckelmann and others (see crit. n.) in bracketing these words: possibly they should be transposed to a place in the next clause, either after γὰρ or after Βοιωτοῖς (in suggesting this I find myself anticipated by an anonymous critic, ap. Teuffel, Rhein. Mus. XXIX. p. 145). That Laconia was a hot-bed of paederasty might be inferred à priori from its military-oligarchical constitution, and is betokened by the verb λακωνίζειν used as a synonym for παιδικοῖς χρῆσθαι (Ar. frag. 322), and the adj. κυσολάκων for παιδεραστής. It is certainly unlikely that a ποικίλος νόμος would be ascribed to the Laconians, and unlikely too that they would be classed apart from the μὴ σοφοὶ λέγειν. Moreover, in 182 D ff. it is ὁ ἐνθάδε (ἡμέτερος) νόμος which is treated as ποικίλος, and no mention is made there of a similar Laconian νόμος. For Laconian mores, Stallb. cites Xen. Rep. Lac. II. 13; Plut. Lac. Inst. p. 237 B; Aelian V. H. III. 10. 12. In Xen. Symp. VIII. 35 the Lacedaemonians are lauded—θεὰν γὰρ οὐ τὴν Ἀναίδειαν ἀλλὰ τὴν Αἰδῶ νομίζουσι (which ought, perhaps, to be construed as implying that they are slighted here).
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.