This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
�� i. Summary of the Argument.
�� ii. The Framework of the Dialogue.
�� iv. Socrates and Diotima.
1 So Hug (Sympos. ad loc.) following Sauppe and Blass: also Jebb, Att. Or. II. 99. I may note here an inconsistency as to the date of Polycrates' “Accusation” in Jebb, Att. Or. I. 150-51 compared with ib. XLV: in the latter place it is set in 393 B.C.
2 In this Dümmler (Akad. p. 66) follows Winckelmann (Antisth. fr. p. 21). Polycrates, however, may be alluded to as well as Antisthenes, as the terms of the reference are wide (ἄλλα τοιαῦτα συχνά); moreover, a close relation may have existed between these two writers.
3 See Dümmler, Antisthenica, pp. 17 ff.
4 See Gomperz, G. T. II. p. 151; Dümmler, Akad. p. 66.
5 See above, § ii. A, ad fin.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.