previous next
1. ἀφροσύνην τι καλεῖς. See above on 330C

3. πότερον δὲ ὅταν. Here begins the proof that σωφροσύνη is ἐναντίον ἀφροσύνῃ. (1) τὸ ὀρθῶς and ὠφελίμως πράττειν is σωφρονεῖν, and σωφροσύνη is that by which one σωφρονεῖ; (2) τὸ μὴ ὀρθῶς πράττειν is ἀφρόνως πράττειν and οὐ σωφρονεῖν: from which it is inferred that ἀφρόνως πράττειν is the opposite of σωφρόνως πράττειν, or (as is worked out at inordinate length) that ἀφροσύνη is the opposite of σωφροσύνη. In equating μὴ ὀρθῶς with ἀφρόνως πράττειν in (2) Socrates again confounds contradictory and contrary: see on 331A

5. τοὐναντίον. So Stallbaum, after Heindorf's τοὐναντίον πράττειν: the MSS. have εἰ τοὐναντίον ἔπραττον, which is faulty both because it in no way corresponds to the answer σωφρονεῖν and because εἰ with the imperfect is here unsuitable. In τοὐναντίον it will be observed that Socrates already allows no middle position between σωφρονεῖν and its opposite: see above on l. 3.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: