previous next
108. ἀμαθία μεγίστη: cf. Laws, III. 689A τίς οὖν μεγίστη δικαίως ἂν λέγοιτο ἀμαθία;—ταύτην τὴν διαφωνίαν λύρης τε καὶ ἡδονῆς ρπὸς τὴν κατὰ λόγον δόξαν ἀμαθίαν φημὶ εἶναι τὴν ἐσχάτην, μεγίστην δέ, ὅτι τοῦ πλήθους ἐστὶ τῆς ψυχῆς.

110. οὔτε αὐτοί: the verb hangs fire: we should expect Plato to continue οὔτε οἱ ὑμέτεροι παῖδες ἔρχονται κτλ. Stephanus thought προσέρχεσθε had fallen out after αὐτοί, Madvig ἴτε, while Kroschel suggests οὔτ᾽ ἐφοιτᾶτε αὐτοί. It seems probable that the text is corrupt; at all events no parallel has yet been adduced. The two cases quoted by Sauppe (Dem. πρὸς Ἄφοβον, § 54, and pseudo-Dem. πρὸς Τιμόθεον, § 52) are more than doubtful in respect of their text, which (as Sauppe quotes it) is not according to the MSS. Madvig's ἴτε is simplest, but the future seems out of place: perhaps ᾖτε should be read.

112. ὡς οὐ διδακτοῦ ὄντος: i.e. τοῦ μὴ ἡδονῆς ἡττᾶσθαι.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: