previous next

ἀλλ᾽ ἄρα. As διεκωλύομεν is certainly interrogative, Ast conjectured ἆρα for ἄρα, but ἄρα (nimirum) is regularly present in a fortiori arguments of this kind, either in the δέ clause (Ap. 34 C, 37 C, D, Crito 46 D) or in both (Crito 50 E, Prot. 325 B, C). In place of the second ἄρα is here written δὴ (τὰ δὲ δὴ περὶ τὸν πόλεμον κτλ.). For the combination ἀλλ᾽ ἄρα cf. Soph. 243 E ἀλλ̓ ἄρα τὰ ἄμφω βούλεσθε καλεῖν ὄν; Ἴσως.

ἀλλὰ σκυτοτόμον. See cr. n. and Introd. § 5. The homoioteleuton as well as the presence of the clause ἵναγίγνοιτο is in favour of the genuineness of these words: and the construction itself, which requires ἐκελεύομεν or the like to be supplied out of διεκωλύομεν (see Heindorf on Gorg. 457 C and Kühner Gr. Gr. II p. 1072), is too idiomatic to have been readily invented by a scribe.

ἐφ᾽ : with σχολὴν ἄγων (Schneider): cf. Ap. 36 D. The phraseology here recalls 370 B and C.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (5 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (5):
    • Plato, Apology, 34c
    • Plato, Apology, 36d
    • Plato, Sophist, 243e
    • Plato, Gorgias, 457c
    • Plato, Protagoras, 325b
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: