The appointed hour found me at the wellremem-bered door of the official chamber,--that door watched daily, with so many conflicting emotions of hope and fear, by the anxious throng regularly gathered there.
The President had preceded me, and was already deep in Acts of Congress, with which the writing-desk was strewed, awaiting his signature.
He received me pleasantly, giving me a seat near his own arm-chair; and after having read Mr. Lovejoy
's note, he took off his spectacles, and said, “Well, Mr.
C-, we will turn you in loose here, and try to give you a good chance to work out your idea.”
Then, without paying much attention to the enthusiastic expression of my ambitious desire and purpose, he proceeded to give me a detailed account of the history and issue of the great proclamation.
“It had got to be,” said he, “midsummer, 1862.
Things had gone on from bad to worse, until I felt that we had reached the end of our rope on the
plan of operations we had been pursuing; that we had about played our last card, and must change our tactics, or lose the game!
I now determined upon the adoption of the emancipation policy; and, without consultation with, or the knowledge of the Cabinet
, I prepared the original draft of the proclamation, and, after much anxious thought, called a Cabinet meeting upon the subject.
This was the last of July, or the first part of the month of August, 1862.”
(The exact date he did not remember.) “This Cabinet meeting took place, I think, upon a Saturday.
All were present, excepting Mr. Blair
, the Postmaster-General
, who was absent at the opening of the discussion, but came in subsequently.
I said to the Cabinet
that I had resolved upon this step, and had not called them together to ask their advice, but to lay the subject-matter of a proclamation before them; suggestions as to which would be in order, after they had heard it read.
,” said he, “was in error when he informed you that it excited no comment, excepting on the part of Secretary Seward
Various suggestions were offered.
wished the language stronger in reference to the arming of the blacks.
, after he came in, deprecated the policy, on the ground that it would cost the Administration the fall elections.
Nothing, however, was offered that I had not already fully anticipated and settled in my own mind, until Secretary Seward
He said in substance: ‘Mr. President
approve of the proclamation, but I question the expediency of its issue at this juncture.
The depression of the public mind, consequent upon our repeated reverses, is so great that I fear the effect of so important a step.
It may be viewed as the last measure of an exhausted government, a cry for help; the government stretching forth its hands to Ethiopia, instead of Ethiopia stretching forth her hands to the government.’
His idea,” said the President
, “was that it would be considered our last shriek, on the retreat.”
(This was his precise
expression.) “ ‘Now,’ continued Mr. Seward
, ‘while I approve the measure, I suggest, sir, that you postpone its issue, until you can give it to the country supported by military success, instead of issuing it, as would be the case now, upon the greatest disasters of the war!’
” Mr. Lincoln
continued: “The wisdom of the view of the Secretary of State
struck me with very great force.
It was an aspect of the case that, in all my thought upon the subject, I had entirely overlooked.
The result was that I put the draft of the proclamation aside, as you do your sketch for a picture, waiting for a victory.
From time to time I added or changed a line, touching it up here and there, anxiously watching the progress of events.
Well, the next news we had was of Pope
's disaster, at Bull Run
Things looked darker than ever.
Finally, came the week of the battle of Antietam
I determined to wait no longer.
The news came, I think, on Wednesday,
that the advantage was on our side.
I was then staying at the Soldiers' Home, (three miles out of Washington
.) Here I finished writing the second draft of the preliminary proclamation; came up on Saturday; called the Cabinet
together to hear it, and it was published the following Monday
At the final meeting of September 20th, another interesting incident occurred in connection with Secretary Seward
The President had written the important part of the proclamation in these words:--
“That, on the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixtythree, all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States
, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the Executive Government
of the United States
, including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize
the freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom.”
“When I finished reading this paragraph,” resumed Mr. Lincoln
, “Mr. Seward
stopped me, and said, ‘I think, Mr. President
, that you should insert after the word ‘recognize’
, in that sentence, the words ‘and maintain.’
’ I replied that I had already fully considered the import of that expression in this connection, but I had not introduced it, because it was not my way
to promise what I was not entirely sure
that I could perform, and I was not prepared to say that I thought we were exactly able to “maintain” this.”
“But,” said he, “Seward
insisted that we ought to take this ground; and the words finally went in!”
“It is a somewhat remarkable fact,” he subsequently remarked, “that there were just one hundred days between the dates of the two proclamations issued upon the 22d of September and the 1st of January.
I had not made the calculation at the time.”
Having concluded this interesting statement, the President
then proceeded to show me the various positions occupied by himself and the different members of the Cabinet
, on the occasion of the first meeting.
“As nearly as I remember,” said he, “I sat near the head of the table; the Secretary of the Treasury
and the Secretary of War
were here, at my right hand; the others were grouped at the left.”
At this point, I exhibited to him a pencil sketch of the composition as I had conceived it, with no knowledge of the facts or details.
The leading idea of this I found, as I have stated on a previous page, to be entirely consistent with the account I had just heard.
I saw, however, that I should have to reverse the picture, placing the President
at the other end of the table, to make it accord with his description.
I had resolved to discard all
appliances and tricks of picture-making, and endeavor, as faithfully as possible, to represent the scene as it actually transpired; room, furniture, accessories, all were to be painted from the actualities.
It was a scene second only in historical importance and interest to that of the Declaration of Independence
; and I felt assured, that, if honestly and earnestly painted, it need borrow no interest from imaginary curtain or column, gorgeous furniture or allegorical statue.
Assenting heartily to what is called the “realistic” school of art, when applied to the illustration of historic events, I felt in this case, that I had no more right to depart from the facts, than has the historian in his record.
When friends said to me, as they frequently did, “Your picture will be bald and barren,” my reply was, “If I cannot make the portraiture of the scene itself sufficiently attractive without the false glitter of tapestry hangings, velvet table-cloths
, and marble columns, then I shall at least have the satisfaction of having failed in the cause of truth.”
I reasoned in this way: The most important document submitted to a cabinet during our existence as a nation is under discussion.
A spectator permitted to look in upon that scene would give little thought and small heed to the mere accessories and adjuncts of the occasion.
His mind would centre upon the immortal document,--its anxious author, conscious of his solemn responsibility, announcing
his matured and inflexible purpose to his assembled councillors.
He would listen with unparalleled eagerness to the momentous sentences uttered for the first time in the ears of men, and to the discussion upon them, impatient of mere formalities and technicalities.
Should a thought be sprung of important bearing, or an overlooked contingency be brought forward, how intently would its effect be watched.
What varying emotions, consequent upon peculiarities of temperament and character, would be expressed in the countenances of the different individuals composing the group.
How each in turn would be scanned.
Above all, the issues involved:--the salvation of the Republicthe freedom of a Race.
“Surely,” I said, “such a scene may be painted, and abiding if not absorbing interest secured, without the aid of conventional trappings.
The republican simplicity of the room and furniture, with its thronging associations, will more than counterbalance the lack of splendor, and the artistic mania for effect.
I will depend solely for my success upon the interest of the subject, and its truthfulness of representation.”
And this purpose I carried with me to the end.