Ladies and Gentlemen
: There is very much in the principles that Judge Douglas
has here enunciated that I most cordially approve, and over which I shall have no controversy with him. In so far as he has insisted that all the States have the right to do exactly as they please about all their domestic relations, including that of slavery, I agree entirely with him. He places me wrong in spite of all I can tell him, though I repeat it again and again, insisting that I have no difference with him upon this subject.
I have made a great many speeches, some of which have been printed, and it will be utterly impossible for him to find any thing that I have ever put in print contrary to what I now say upon this subject.
I hold myself under constitutional obligations to allow the people in all the States, without interference, direct or indirect, to do exactly as they please, and I deny that I have any inclination to interfere with them, even if there were no such constitutional obligation.
I can only say again that.
I am placed improperly-altogether improperly, in spite of all I can say — when it is insisted that I entertain any other view or purposes in regard to that matter.
While I am upon this subject, I will make some answers briefly to certain propositions that Judge Douglas
has put. He says, “Why can't this Union endure permanently, half slave and half free?”
I have said that I supposed it could not, and I will try, before this new audience, to give briefly some of the reasons for entertaining that opinion.
Another form of his question is, “Why can't we let it stand as our fathers placed it?”
That is the exact difficulty between us. I say, that Judge Douglas
and his friends have changed them from the position in which our fathers originally placed it. I say, in the way our fathers originally left, the slavery question, the institution was in the course of ultimate extinction, and the public mind rested in the belief that it was
in the course of ultimate extinction.
I say when this Government was first established, it was the policy of its founders to prohibit, the spread of slavery into the new Territories
of the United States
, where it had not existed.
But Judge Douglas
and his friends have broken up that policy, and placed it upon a new basis by which it is to become national and perpetual.
All I have asked or desired any where is that it should be placed back again upon the basis that the fathers of our Government originally placed it upon.
I have no doubt that it would become extinct, for all time to come, if we but readopted the policy of the fathers by restricting it to the limits it has already covered-restricting it from the new Territories
I do not wish to dwell at great length on this branch of the subject at this time, but, allow me to repeat one thing that I have stated before.
, the man who assaulted Senator Sumner
on the floor of the Senate, and who was complimented with dinners, and silver pitchers, and gold-headed canes, and a good many other things for that feat, in one of his speeches declared that when this Government was originally established, nobody expected that the institution of slavery would last until this day. That was but the opinion of one man, but it was such an opinion as we can never get from Judge Douglas
or anybody in favor of slavery in the North
at all. You can
sometimes get it from a Southern man. He said at the same time that, the framers of our Government did not have the knowledge that experience has taught us — that experience and the invention of the cotton-gin have taught us that the perpetuation of slavery is a necessity.
He insisted, therefore, upon its being changed from the basis upon which the fathers of the Government
left it to the basis of its perpetuation and nationalization.
I insist that this is the difference between Judge Douglas
and myself — that Judge Douglas
is helping that change along.
I insist upon this Government being placed where our fathers originally placed it.
I remember Judge Douglas
once said that he saw the evidences on the statute books of Congress, of a policy in the origin of Government to divide slavery and