observation that it was “singular that the courts would hold that a man never lost his right to his property that had been stolen from him, but that he instantly lost his right to himself if he was stolen.”
It is useless to add more evidence — for it could be piled mountain high — showing that at the very outset Mr. Lincoln
was sound to the core on the injustice and crime of human slavery.
After a brief rest at his home in Chicago Mr. Douglas
betook himself to the country, and in October, during the week of the State Fair, we find him in Springfield
On Tuesday he made a speech in the State House
which, in view of the hostile attitude of some of his own party friends, was a labored defense of his position.
It was full of ingenious sophistry and skilful argument.
An unprecedented concourse of people had gathered from all parts of the State
, and Douglas
, fresh from the halls of Congress, was the lion of the hour.
On the following day Mr. Lincoln
, as the champion of the opponents of Popular Sovereignty, was selected to represent those who disagreed with the new legislation, and to answer Douglas
His speech encouraged his friends no less than it startled his enemies.
At this time I was zealously interested in the new movement, and not less so in Lincoln
I frequently wrote the editorials in the Springfield Journal
, the editor, Simeon Francis
, giving to Lincoln
and to me the utmost liberty in that direction.
would write out matter for publication, but I believe I availed myself of the privilege oftener than he. The editorial in the issue containing the