Hence I have long thought that there was usually a very unnecessary expenditure of sympathy on behalf of certain enslaved nations of Europe
, as well as the African of this country.
A nation, the masses of whom have arisen to the moral condition of freedom, will assert their political rights; and they will usually do it on practicable grounds.
It is only at this point that they challenge public sympathy.
For the mind was never before sufficiently free to make their situation an oppressive one, assuming that their rulers do not abuse their power.
Before this period, their rights lay in being governed — not in governing.
Political freedom would be as dangerous intrusted to them, as a razor would be in the hands of a child, and should, for the same general reasons, be withheld from them.
But withheld by whom?
asks the philosophy of Dr. Wayland
I answer, By those who have the intelligence to do it. Both the principle of benevolence and the law of reciprocity require this; and that intelligence which imposes this duty, can never fail to supply the means for the restraint of brute force.
Of the truth of this general position no people appear to be more sensible than the aristocracy of Europe
clearly asserts this on their behalf, when he states that the object of his tour through the United States
arose from the