hereditary government may be adopted.
In this government, the principle of slavery
is made to operate less actively, and there is. more room for the play of the opposite principle of self-control.
But as the moral principle is yet too feeble for self-government proper, it is still held in strong check by its antagonistic principle — the principle of slavery.
As they advance in intellectual and moral cultivation, a further modification of the relative operation of these principles is indicated as proper.
It may become more and more elective: that is, more and more of a democratic republic; and in a suitable moral condition it may be wholly so: that is, a government in which the principle of slavery
and the principle of liberty
operate in about equal ratios.
We call this a well-balanced government.
If it fulfil this condition, it is because these opposing principles so check and counterpoise each other that the government is not likely to be unbalanced.
One holds the other in equilibrio
. The principle of self-control is in such vigorous operation among the masses, and so craned up to a vigilant activity by coincident forces derived from intelligence and interest, that the principle of slavery — control by the will of another, which in this instance is the will of the majority
--is not competent, according to the theory of this government, to override and crush the