be in conflict with right principle,--they really find themselves in a most embarrassing situation, from which they sigh to be released.
Many such have quietly retired from the State
of their nativity and choice as their only alternative.
(This may account for more of those removals, usually attributed to worn-out lands, than many of our politicians wot of.) Others remain, it is true, but it is rather an act of subjection than submission.
Citizens of this class (and it is not a small class) are of course always liable to become the victims of any fanatical movement on the subject of slavery that may be afoot in the land.
To all this mischief, the speakers and writers in question have contributed their full share.
Yea, for myself, I doubt not they have contributed much more to dissatisfy the religious community of the South
--the large majority of the whole population — than all the abolitionists of the North
It is doubtless the magic of their names which at present enables the M. E. Church
(the most regular and well-defined anti-slavery, if not indeed abolitionist, association this day existing in the country) to maintain its footing in the District of Columbia, the States of Delaware
, and along the northern border of Eastern and through a large part of Western Virginia
, together with a portion of Kentucky