military or patriarchal form of government, both as regards the expense and the comfort, there can be no controversy, we may consider the claims of the patriarchal form, or the system of domestic slavery, as established in this case.
But it may be supposed that the experiment in the Northern States
invalidates the position, that this, being a distinct race of people, must be controlled by a separate and subordinate form of government.
These States have a portion of this race, and it is said they find no difficulty to result from having placed them on a political footing with other citizens.
But this is a mere assumption.
It is not borne out by the facts of history.
As before stated, the conventional usages of society have denied them the social rights and privileges of free citizens!
They have proscribed then as an inferior and degraded race.
The usage which forbids intermarriage is at once a bar to all social equality.
The road to offices of trust, honor, and profit, is closed against them — nay, even the means of subsistence beyond a scanty supply of the necessaries of life.
These facts are undeniable.
Now, to talk of liberty when we effectually deny to a people all that essentially constitutes it, is idle in the extreme.
It is a mere paper liberty!--liberty to submit to the crushing usages of society!--liberty to