when first brought into this country were not a whit better in morals, and were greatly inferior in intellect to the ancient inhabitants of Canaan
And, although it be admitted that they have improved, the facts given clearly prove that they are still incompetent to self-government.
They are, therefore, no more entitled to the right of political sovereignty than the Canaanites were.
But more than this, the Canaanites did not materially differ from the Jews in their physical condition.
There were no physical reasons against amalgamation.
Intermarriage, it is true, was forbidden, but it was for reasons growing out of their heathen state alone.
Whilst that state should last, the common interests of each in civilization forbade such social equality; but this cause out of the way, the Canaanites could be absorbed and lost in the stream of posterity.
But not so with the African, as we have shown.
He is destined to exist as a separate people.
We do not say he shall not, but he cannot to any material extent amalgamate with the Caucasian race.
If, therefore, it was proper for the Jews to make slaves of the Canaanites, for a much stronger reason it is now right for us to retain the African in a similar state, and until such time as Providence
shall — if ever — open the door for his return to his fatherland.