really the inspirer of our foreign policy, that policy would at least be expounded more forcibly if it had a Philistine for its spokesman.
Yet I think the true moral to be drawn is rather, perhaps, this: that our foreign policy would be improved if our whole society were homogeneous.
As to the confusion in the House of Commons, what, apart from defective rules of procedure, are its causes?
First and foremost, no doubt, the temper and action of the Irish members.
But putting this cause of confusion out of view for a moment, every one can see that the House of Commons is far too large, and that it undertakes a quantity of business which belongs more properly to local assemblies.
The confusion from these causes is one which is constantly increasing, because, as the country becomes fuller and more awakened, business multiplies, and more and more members of the House
are inclined to take part in it. Is not the cure for this found in a course like that followed in America
, in having a much less numerous House of Commons, and in making over a large part of its business to local assemblies, elected, as the House of Commons itself will henceforth be elected, by household suffrage?
I have often said that we seem to me