democracy may not be like theirs.
As our country becomes more democratic, the malady here may no longer be that we have an upper class materialized, a middle class vulgarized, and a lower class brutalized.
But the predominance of the common and ignoble, born of the predominance of the average man, is a malady too. That the common and ignoble is human nature's enemy, that, of true human nature, distinction and beauty are needs, that a civilization is insufficient where these needs are not satisfied, faulty where they are thwarted, is an instruction of which we, as well as the Americans
, may greatly require to take fast hold, and not to let go. We may greatly require to keep, as if it were our life, the doctrine that we are failures after all, if we cannot eschew vain boasting and vain imaginations,--eschew what flatters in us the common and ignoble, and approve things that are truly excellent.
I have mentioned evangelical Protestantism.
There is a text which evangelical Protestantism — and, for that matter, Catholicism too — translates wrong, and takes in a sense too narrow.
The text is that well-known one, “except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.”
Instead of again
, we ought to translate from above;
and instead of taking the