contradicts the appellant.
By that statement, the effective strength of this army “at and near Dalton
” was forty thousand four hundred and sixty-four infantry and artillery, and twenty-three hundred and ninety cavalry.
The prisoners of war taken since the organization of the Army of Tennessee, in 1862, were always borne on its returns.
In 1864 there were not quite seven thousand of them.
More than two-thirds1
of the number reported by General Hood
; the remainder2
by General Hardee
; none by Polk
, whose corps had not belonged to this army before 1864.
To swell the list of my losses, General Hood
asserted that the prisoners taken by the enemy at Shiloh
, Murfreesboroa, Chickamauga
, Missionary Ridge
, and in the intermediate skirmishes, were lost by me in the campaign in Georgia
The only prisoners taken from us during this campaign, that I heard of, were a company of skirmishers of Hardee
's corps, and an outpost of Hood
's (some two hundred men), captured about the middle of June, and a few taken from the right of Walker
's and left of French
's skirmishers on the 27th.
As we usually fought in intrenched lines which were always held, the enemy rarely had an opportunity to make prisoners.
The fact that those referred to by General Hood
belonged to his corps and Hardee
's only, which were the old Army of Tennessee, while none were reported in Polk
's corps, which had never before belonged to that army, indicates clearly that those prisoners were captured in operations previous to this campaign.