We believe that we are only stating a simple truth when we say that every dispute which has existed between this country and the United States
, during the present century, has arisen from the susceptibilities of the American
people with respect to some supposed invasion of their national dignity and rights.
The war of 1812 was occasioned by the right of search — a question which the treaty of Ghent
and the Ashburton
capitulation alike left unadjusted.
The affair of the Caroline
's trial, the Maine
boundary and Oregon
disputes, and the recent San Juan
difficulty, (now happily forgotten), are all examples of the boastful and offensive spirit in which successive Presidents
have endeavored to assert the national dignity and rights of the once great American people.
In the civil war which at present afflicts the United States the Cabinet at Washington has acted in strict conformity with public law
, at least in intention, if not in actual practice.
It has adhered to the declaration of neutral rights annexed to the Treaty
, it has abolished the odious practice of privateering
, and, in imitation of the policy of European
nations, it has practically conceded belligerent rights to the enemy.
It has not treated captured secessionists as traitors, but has extended to them the usual courtesies of war
. The Southern authorities, on the other hand, have commissioned letters of marque, and these sea rovers, if the account be true, have proved in a very satisfactory manner that the Federal
blockade, extending over a coast of more than two thousand miles, is only valid on paper
. An American correspondent writing from Pensacola
the other day, not only stated, but professed to give, the text of a letter in which Admiral Milne
, the commander of the British squadron, had officially notified to the Admiralty
that the blockade of the Southern
ports was altogether ineffectual.
On a former occasion we expressed a doubt whether so discreet and experienced an officer as Admiral Milne would have committed an act so obviously beyond the pale of his duty.
The authoritative contradiction which has been given to this clever American fabrication was scarcely necessary
, because everybody knows, as a matter of fact, that the Federal Government
does not possess at present a naval force sufficient to close all the Southern
ports from Virginia
All that it can hope to do is to blockade the most important points, such as the mouths of the Mississippi
, and the great seats of the cotton export trade.
We are, however, now informed that by means of gunboats, and other vessels of little draught, an attempt is to be made to enforce the entire line of blockade.
If the Federal Government
can accomplish this object, neutral nations will have no cause of complaint, because the blockade would then be effectual.
If, on the other hand, the attempt should fail, merchant vessels would practically share in the immunity which the Southern
privateers appear at present to enjoy.
Of course it is extremely annoying to neutral commerce to be warned off the coast and compelled to return home, or to sail to New York or Canada
, where the freight may be at a discount, and a return cargo cannot be obtained without a great sacrifice of time and money.
But these are necessary evils which spring from a state of war;
hard, we admit, to be endured by innocent parties; but so long as the action of the Federal Government
is in conformity with public law, no one has a right to complain.
When the American courts condemn foreign vessels for the breach of a mere paper blockade, the intervention of diplomacy will then be requisite
, but at present no case has occurred either to merit or command the interference of neutral Powers.
If Admiral Milne
had made the report which has been attributed to him, the Federal Government
would have a just right of complaint, because questions of the validity of blockades are not within the jurisdiction of an admiral commanding a squadron in the neighboring seas, but belong to those great courts which, either in belligerent or neutral countries, administer the law of nations
. Knowing and fully appreciating the feelings with which the people of America
regard every expression of foreign opinion, we are, upon the whole, glad that this idle story has received not only timely but official contradiction.
If Admiral Milne
had volunteered the statement which has been attributed to him, the Northern
people, who are not likely to be much pleased with English criticism and comments upon the recent battle of Bull Run
, would say that England
preferred the pursuit of cotton to the obligations of honesty and fair play.
As Lord Palmerston at the commencement of the contest stated, every question of neutral rights must be decided when a fitting case arises.
This contingency has not yet arrived; and if the Federal Government
can succeed in efficiently maintaining so enormous a blockade, it will in all probability never occur.
It is the duty of this country, in the terms of her Majesty's declaration, to observe strict and impartial neutrality.
For simply doing this England
has been abused and vilified by the Northern
press, and Canada
was to be annexed to compensate for the loss of the South
We can afford to despise all this ludicrous and impotent malice, but as happily we have hitherto escaped all difficulties about American native dignity and rights, let us leave the two contending parties to fight their battles as best they may, without the slightest interference or even advice on our part.
If the blockade be ineffectual, neutral commerce will comparatively suffer little injury; if effectual, the first principles of public law tell us that we must obey with a good grace
, however disagreeable the restriction may be for one great staple of British industry and British wealth.--London Post
, (Government Organ
,) Aug. 14.