The reader will not fail to observe that the proposition for a suspension of hostilities to allow the civil authorities to negotiate, was not even entertained; that the agreement was, in fact, a military convention, in which all reference to the civil authorities was excluded, except by the admission that the negotiators respectively had principals from whom they must obtain authority, i.e., ratification of the agreement into which they had entered. There seemed to be a special dread on the part of the United States officials lest they should do something which would be construed as the recognition of the existence of a government which for four years they had been vainly trying to subdue. Now, as on previous occasions, I cared little for the form, and therefore gave my consideration only to the substance of the agreement. In consideration of the disbandment of our armies it provided for the recognition of the several state governments, guaranteed to the people of the states their political rights and franchises, as well as their rights of person and property as defined by the Constitution of the United States and other states respectively; promised not to disturb any of the people by reason of the late war, and generally indicated that the United States government was to be restricted to the exercise of the powers delegated in the Constitution. Though this convention, if ratified, would not have all the binding force of a treaty, it secured to our people the political rights and safety from pillage, to obtain which I propose to continue the war. I,
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.