under whom I had the honor to serve in that campaign.
I refer to them only for the consideration of others.
（1) In the report of General Thomas
dated January 20, 1865, covering the entire period of the campaign, including both the battles of Franklin
, in his commendation of subordinates he made no distinction between the corps commanders who had served immediately under him and only in the battle of Nashville
, and the army commander who, besides the like service at Nashville
, had commanded the army in the field, in the absence therefrom of General Thomas
, up to and including the battle of Franklin
, where signal victory had prepared the way for the less difficult but brilliant success of General Thomas
（2) In the first letter from General Thomas
recommending promotions for services in the campaign, containing the names of a large number of officers, no mention was made of my name or that of General Stanley
, who had been conspicuous for gallantry at Spring Hill
and at Franklin
, where he was wounded.
（3) In a telegram from the Secretary of War
calling for recommendations for promotion, General Thomas
had been informed that while there was no vacancy in the grade of major-general (the last having, in fact, been given to General Thomas
himself), there were then two vacancies in that of brigadier-general; and it was after the receipt of that information, and in view of all it might be understood to imply, that General Thomas
sent his telegram to the Secretary of War
recommending that Stanley
and I be brevetted one grade in the regular service, not, as he had said in his indorsement on my report of the battle of Franklin
, for ‘skill,’ but for ‘good conduct.’
As General Thomas
well knew, I was then only a captain in the regular army.
Hence he recommended me for the brevet of major—that is, of commander of