making the subjugation more complete of those of the Southern
people who were thus made to ‘feel the weight of war.’
Considered as to its military results, Sherman
's march cannot be regarded as more than I have stated—a grand raid.
The defeat and practical destruction of Hood
's army in Tennessee
was what paved the way to the speedy termination of the war, which the capture of Lee
fully accomplished; and the result ought to have been essentially the same as to time if Sherman
's march had never been made.
The capitulation of Johnston
was but the natural sequence of Lee
's surrender; for Johnston
's army was not surrounded, and could not have been compelled to surrender.
could not have prevented that army from marching back into the Gulf
States and continuing the war for a time.
In military history Sherman
's great march must rank only as auxiliary to the far more important operations of Grant
Sherman at the time saw clearly enough this view of the case; hence his undeviating bent toward the final object of his march, disregarding all minor ends—to take part in the capture of Lee
During General Sherman
's interviews with the President
and General Grant
at City Point
, his mind must have been absorbed with this one idea which was the sole reason of his visit.
Terms of surrender and the policy to be pursued toward the conquered South
must have been referred to very casually, and nothing approximating instructions on the subject can have been received or asked for by General Sherman
Else how is it possible that the very pointed and emphatic instructions of the President
to General Grant
, dated March 3, 1865,1
were not made known to him or the spirit of them conveyed to him in conversation?
The question of the abstract wisdom of the terms of the