from their course of studies some of the comparatively unimportant ‘ologies,’ and substitute the qualifications for good citizenship, the change would be greatly for the better.
was one of those rare actors in historic events who require no eulogy.
All his important acts were so unqualifiedly his own, and so emphatically speak for themselves, that it is only necessary to judge of the quality and merits of those acts.
There is no question of division of honors between him and any other respecting any of his important operations.
It is not meant by this that he was disdainful of the advice or opinions of others.
On the contrary, although naturally impulsive and self-reliant, his acquired habit was to study carefully and consult freely with his subordinate commanders respecting all important movements.
Yet discussion resulted almost if not quite invariably in the adoption of his own original plans.
As to details, he was wont to leave them very much to his subordinates, and, I think, did not estimate very accurately the possibilities or probabilities of the accomplishment of the details necessary to the success of his general plans.
It is certainly not too much to say that his expectations in this regard were very frequently unrealized.
But of this it must be observed that the character of the theater of war made the handling of a large army extremely difficult, precision of movements impossible, and any accurate estimate of the time in which projected operations could be accomplished by no means easy.
Criticism of General Sherman
, or of his subordinates, based upon military experience in other countries or upon the success of his able antagonist General Johnston
, to whom Sherman
's difficulties were corresponding advantages, is likely to be extremely unjust.
In short, Sherman
's campaigns stand alone, without a parallel in military history; alike unique in their conception, execution, and final results;