appear to be acting not in harmony with the President
So far as I know, this subject does not appear to have been submitted to the President
until some time in 1863, after Major-General Curtis
, as department commander, had for some months carried out the radical theory of military confiscation, and I, as his successor, had put a stop to it. Then an appeal was made to the President
, and he, in his celebrated letter of instructions of October 1, 1863, directed the military to have nothing to do with the matter.
The State administration of Missouri
, under its conservative governor, was of course sternly opposed to this radical policy, including the forced liberation of slaves, for which there was at that time no warrant of law or executive authority.
A simple sense of duty compelled the military commander
to act in these matters more in harmony with the State
government than with the radical party, and in radical eyes he thus became identified with their enemies, the conservatives.
This gave rise on August 4, 1862, to a meeting of prominent citizens of St. Louis
, who adopted resolutions, of the most important of which the following was reported to be a true copy:
Resolved, That a committee of gentlemen be requested to go to Washington City to urge upon the President the appointment of a commander of the military forces of this State who will, under instructions, act with vigor in suppressing the guerrillas of this State, and with authority to enlist the militia of the State into the service of the United States.
The chair appointed, as the committee to go to Washington
, Henry T. Blow
, John C. Vogle
, I. H. Sturgeon
, and Thomas O'Reilley
, and authorized Mr. Blow
to add to this committee any other ‘true Union man’ who would go. Who, if any, besides Messrs. Blow
, and O'Reilley
actually composed the committee, I was never informed.