and generous treatment shown by General Sherman
toward me from the beginning of that campaign.
Although much my senior in years, experience, and reputation, he never showed that he was aware of it, but always treated me as his peer.
In his official reports and his memoirs he has never been unkind or unjust, though it has never been his habit to bestow much praise on individuals, or to think much of the rewards due his subordinates, generally giving credit as justly due to troops rather than to commanders.
It would be impossible for me not to cherish feelings of strong affection for my old commander, as well as the profound respect due his character as a man and soldier, and his brilliant genius.
If anything I may say in criticism of General Sherman
's acts or words shall seem unkind or be considered unjust, I can only disclaim any such feeling, and freely admit that it would be wholly unworthy of the relations that always existed between us. I write not for the present, but for the future, and my only wish is to represent the truth as it appears to me. If I fail to see it clearly, I do but condemn myself.
History will do impartial justice.
Having been in a subordinate position in the campaigns of 1864 in Georgia
, I shall not attempt to write a full account of those campaigns, but shall limit myself to such comments as seem to me to be called for upon the already published histories of those campaigns.
In estimating the merits of Sherman
it should be remembered that he does not, and does not claim to, occupy the position of a disinterested, impartial historian.
He writes, not for the purpose of doing equal and exact justice to all actors in a great historical drama, but for the purpose of elucidating his own acts and motives, and vindicating himself against the harsh criticism