broken the road ever so ‘good’ and then fallen back to the Gap
as ordered, Johnston
could have moved his main army to Resaca
that night, and at daylight the next morning Sherman
would have found in the enemy's trenches at Dalton
only a skirmish-line which would have leisurely retreated before him to the new position at Resaca
The result would have been essentially the same as that which was actually accomplished.
Indeed, as it now seems clearly to appear to General Sherman
, the only possible mode of striking an effective blow at Dalton
was to capture Resaca
or seize and hold a point on the road in rear of Dalton
, and not
to break the road and fall back as McPherson
was ordered to do. If Sherman
had seen this clearly at the time, it is inconceivable that he would have sent less than one fourth of his army to execute the all-important part of the plan.
And he now judges McPherson
as manifesting timidity1
because he did not at the critical moment attempt to accomplish, with his comparatively small force, what Sherman
should have ordered to be done by a much larger force.
A very bold, independent commander might have attempted, whether successful or not, what Sherman
ought to have done at Resaca
; and, as Sherman
says, such an opportunity does not occur twice in the life of any man. But McPherson
was a subordinate in spirit as well as in fact, and cannot fairly be charged with timidity for not attempting what he was not ordered to do, and what, in fact, was no part of the plans of his superior so far as they were indicated in his orders.
had assaulted Resaca
, it is possible, but only possible, that he might have succeeded.
There were some cases during the Civil War
where intrenchments hastily constructed and imperfectly defended were carried