her despatches in these words: ‘Come on!
why do you not come?’
We could, in this connection, were it not necessary to resume the thread of our narrative, tell of some very interesting occurrences, showing the manner in which news was brought to General Beauregard
We mention a single instance.
About the middle of July, on a bright, sultry morning, a young lady of much refinement, and possessing both youth and beauty, rode into General Bonham
's lines, at Fairfax Court-House, and delivered to him a despatch of great importance, for General Beauregard
, ‘from our friends in Washington
She had incurred great fatigue and danger in the accomplishment of her mission.
This despatch she carried carefully concealed in her hair, which, when enrolled in the presence of the Confederate
general, appeared to him—to use his own language—‘the most beautiful he had ever seen on human head.’1
The young lady in question was a resident of the Federal
capital, and had passed out of it in a small farm wagon, disguised as a plain countrywoman coming from market.
Farther on her way, at the residence of a relative, well known and wealthy, she obtained the horse she was riding and the habit she then wore.
We refrain from giving her name, but it will never be forgotten either by General Beauregard
or by General Bonham
, and is, no doubt, as deeply graven upon the memory of the several staff officers who had the pleasure of escorting her through our lines.
We wish, nevertheless—and look upon it as a duty—to place upon record her patriotic deed, so fearlessly and successfully accomplished.
Irregular and unofficial as were the secret communications here spoken of, General Beauregard
, who knew their importance and trustworthiness, never failed to forward their contents to the War Department. Mr. Davis
, therefore, was aware—or should have been—of what General Beauregard
thought of the readiness of Washington
to resist an advance of our forces at that time.
It is not here pretended that no one spoke to Mr. Davis
, on that occasion, as he asserts that General Beauregard
did; but it is now stated, emphatically, and on the direct authority of General Beauregard
, that he did not make use of any such language to Mr. Davis
In support of the position here so positively assumed the reader is referred, first, to the fact, afterwards so thoroughly