Indifference in regard to the rights of peoples of color is unfortunately not the only nor even the greatest charge to be laid at the door of the Republican party.
It may be asserted that this party has become an active aggressor in trampling down the liberties of colored peoples.
As the assignee of Spain
in taking over (without consulting those who were most concerned) the control of the territory of the Philippine Islands
, it has purchased (and has paid cash for) the right to dominate from eight to ten millions of people.
These people may, under the existing conditions, be described as being in a state of slavery.
If a foreign people, say a people coming from the other side of the globe, should treat Americans
as we have treated the Filipinos, should deny to us the right of self-government, should send great armies to chastise us for disobedience (or for what they might call “rebellion” ), and should do this for no better reason than that our skin was darker or lighter than their own, we Americans
would doubtless consider ourselves to be in a state of slavery.
Why in any sense is slavery in Luzon
more defensible than slavery in South Carolina
or in Alabama
If it be wrong to keep in slavery the black man in America
(as in theory at least we are all now agreed it is wrong), what is the justice in depriving of his freedom the brown-skinned Tagal?
Can a bill of sale from Spain
give to us any such privilege, if privilege it may be called?
Can an agreement with Spain
bring to naught our responsibilities under our own Declaration of Independence
Although, owing to the remoteness of the islands,