Nobody has been disturbed.
The newspapers, beyond reporting the facts, have had nothing to say. The Church
has been silent-at least that can be said of the Protestant Church.
Not one brave or manly word of protest or condemnation has the writer heard, or heard of, from a Protestant American pulpit.
, being victims and sufferers, have complained and protested.
The greatest discomfort these things have produced has been occasioned by the apprehension that, through somebody's lack of patriotism, our flag may be withdrawn from the field of such glorious operations.
It used to be our boast that Freedom followed our flag.
Now slavery follows it.
In view of the facts stated we can understand, not only the serenity, but the favor with which the people of this country, or the great body of them, so long looked upon the workings of African
slavery, and the difficulty which the Abolitionists had in arousing a sentiment of revulsion toward it.
One of the curious things in this connection is the similarity — the practical sameness — of the arguments used to justify the Philippine occupation and those once used to justify American slaveholding.
We are now working to civilize and Christianize the Filipinos, and were then civilizing and Christianizing the negroes with the lash and the bludgeon.
Of course, there are other arguments.
Increase of trade and wealth, as the result of our appropriation of other peoples' possessions, is freely predicted.
It has always been the robber's plea.
That is what it is to-day, even when employed by a professed Christian nation.
Nor is it improved by the fact