The result of the interview that followed was such that the Democrat
was materially assisted in continuing its publication.
It is hardly necessary to state that I never heard anything more of the one-thousand-dollar indorsement, the sole purpose of which was, doubtless, to test my sincerity.
Soon afterwards I was offered the political editorship of the Democrat
, which I accepted on the one condition that there was to be “no let — up on emancipation.”
I held the position until Missouri
was a free State.
In a surprisingly short time after the question of Missouri
's status in reference to the Union
was decided, the issue between Pro-Slaveryism and Anti-Slaveryism came up. Political parties ranged themselves upon it. Those who favored slavery's immediate or speedy abolishment became known as Radicals, while those advocating its prolongation were called Conservatives.
Those descriptives, however, were too mild for such a time, and they were quickly superseded by a more expressive local nomenclature.
The Radicals, because of their alleged sympathy with the negro, were branded as “Charcoals,” and their opponents, made up of Republicans, Democrats, and Semi-Unionists
, because of the variegated complexion of the mixture, were set down as “Claybanks
Mulattoes are Claybanks
, or Conservatives, at the outset enjoyed a decided advantage in having the State
government on their side.
This was not the regularly elected administration, which was driven out