heard Prof. Hudson
, of Oberlin College, express the same idea in about the same words many years before.
And yet there were plenty of Northern people to whom “Amalgamation” --the word used to describe the apprehended union of the races — was a veritable scarecrow.
A young gentleman in a neighborhood near where I lived when a boy was in all respects eligible for matrimony.
He became devoted to the daughter of an old farmer who had been a Kentuckian, and asked him for her hand.
“But I am told,” said the old gentleman, “that you are an Abolitionist.”
The young man admitted the justice of the charge.
“Then, sir,” fairly roared the old man, “you can't have my daughter; go and marry a nigger.”
But what probably gave slavery its strongest hold upon the favor of Northern people was the animosity toward the negro that prevailed among them.
Nowhere was he treated by them like a human being.
The “black laws,” as those statutes in a number of free States that regulated the treatment of the blacks were appropriately called, were inhuman in the extreme.
was in the main a liberal State.
She was called a free State, but her negroes were not free men. Under her laws they could only remain in the State
by giving bonds for good behavior.
Any one employing negroes, not so bonded, was liable to a fine of one hundred dollars. They could not vote, of course.
They could not testify in a case in which a white man was interested.
They could not send their children to schools which they helped to support.
The only thing they could do “like a white man” was to pay taxes.