about it. We are merely extending the area of liberty,--nothing else.
We have made great progress.
The law passed in your State at the last session of the legislature grants, in fact, the whole question.
The moment you grant us anything, we have gained the whole.
You cannot stop with an inconsistent statute-book.
A man is uneasy who is inconsistent.
As old Fuller
says, “You cannot make one side of the face laugh, and the other cry!”
You cannot have one half your statute-book Jewish
, and the other Christian
; one half the statute-book Oriental
, the other Saxon
You have granted that women may be hung, therefore you must grant that women may vote.
You have granted that she may be taxed; therefore, on republican principles, you must grant that she ought to have a voice in fixing the laws of taxation,--and this is, in fact, all that we claim — the whole of it.
Now I want to consider some of the objections that are made to this claim.
Men say: “Woman is not fit to vote; she does not know enough; she has not sense enough to vote.”
I take this idea of the ballot as the Gibraltar of our claim for this reason, because I am speaking in a democracy; I am speaking under republican institutions.
The rule of despotism is that one class is made to protect the other; that the rich, the noble, the educated, are a sort of Probate Court, to take care of the poor, the ignorant, and the common classes.
Our fathers got rid of all that.
They knocked it in the head by the simple principle that no class is safe, unless government is so arranged that each class has in its own hands the means of protecting itself.
That is the idea of republics.
says to the poor man: “Be content!
I am worth five millions and I will protect you;” America says: “Thank you, sir; I had rather take care of myself!” --and that is the essence