to their owner better than a score of statutes.
It is worth more than a thousand colleges, and makes armies and police superfluous.
The importation of Chinese
labor seeks to take that dollar
from our working-man.
The true statesman must regard such a policy as madness.
The philanthropist must consider it cruel and mad too. Even so much of such a result as will inevitably be wrought by the natural immigration of the Chinese is to be deplored; every aggravation of it is to be resisted for the sake of republicanism and civilization.
If we cannot find in the armory of the law some effectual weapon to prevent it, our political and social future, for fifty years, is dark indeed, and such a fate as swallowed up Roman civilization is by no means impossible.
Every one cries out for cheap labor to develop the country.
Even if material or pecuniary gain were the only requisite for social or natural progress,--which, of course it is far from being,--still it is true that unsettled lands may be opened up too fast for profit, much more for real progress.
Indeed, this random and thoughtless cry for cheap labor
is one of the great mistakes of heartless and superficial economists; seldom has there been a graver mistake.
We assert unhesitatingly that cheap productions are an unmixed good; cheap labor is an unmitigated evil.
Human progress shows itself in a fall of prices and a rise of wages.
Although labor makes one half the cost of production, still it is true that the world gains just so fast as prices fall and wages rise.
To insure progress, the cost of everything but human muscle and brains must fall.
The remuneration of these two elements in production must rise.
In William Penn
's time it took one hundred and thirty-seven days toil to buy a ton of flour; in 1790, one hundred and twenty-five days labor would buy it;