Of this class of men, Dr. Crosby
says “their learned ignorance is splendid;” they are “inventors of a theory of magnificent daring;” they “use false texts” and “deceptive arguments;” “deal dishonestly with the Scriptures;” “beg the question and build on air;” their theory is a “fable,” born of “falsehoods,” supported by “Scripture twisting and wriggling;” their arguments are “cobwebs,” and their zeal outstrips their judgment, and they plan to “undermine the Bible
This is a fearful indictment!
Who are these daring, ridiculous, and illogical sinners?
As I call them up in my memory, the first one who comes to me is Moses Stuart
, of Andover
, whose lifelong study of the Bible
and profound critical knowledge of both its languages place him easily at the head of all American commentators.
His well-balanced mind, conservative to a fault on many points, clears him from any suspicion of being misled by enthusiasm or warping his opinions to suit novel theories.
's Scripture view of the wine question” was the ablest contribution, thirty years ago, to this claim about unfermented wine, and it still holds its place, unanswered and unanswerable.
By his side stands Dr. Nott
, the head of Union College, with the snows of ninety winters on his brow.
Around them gather scores of scholars and divines on both sides of the Atlantic
In our day Tayler Lewis
gives to the American
public, with his scholarly indorsement, the exhaustive commentary by Dr. Lees
on every text in the Bible
which speaks of wine,--a work of sound learning, the widest research, and fairest argument.
The ripe scholarship, long study of the Bible
, and critical ability of these men entitle them to be considered experts on this question.
In a matter of Scripture interpretation it would be empty compliment to say that Dr. Crosby
is worthy to loose the latchet of their