“a strait-jacket;” says it kills self-respect and undermines all character.
Hannah More said: “We cannot expect perfection in any one; but we may demand consistency of every one.”
It does not tend to show the sincerity of these critics of our cause when we find them objecting in us to what they themselves uniformly practise on all other occasions.
If we continue to believe in their sincerity, it can only be at the expense of their intelligence.
is, undoubtedly, a member of a church.
Does he mean to say that when his church demanded his signature to its creed and his pledge to obey its discipline, it asked what it was “unmanly” in him to grant, and what destroys an individual's character; that his submission to this is “foregoing his reasoning,” “sinking back to his nonage,” etc?
Of course he assents to none of these things.
He only objects to a Temperance pledge, not to a church pledge.
The husband pledges himself to his wife, and she to him, for life.
Is the marriage ceremony, then, a curse, a hindrance to virtue and progress?
I have known men who, borrowing money, refused to sign any promissory note.
They thought it unmanly and evidence chat I distrusted them.
Does Dr. Crosby
think the world should change its customs and immediately adopt that plan?
Society rests in all its transactions on the idea that a solemn promise, pledge, assertion, strengthens and assures the act. It recognizes this principle of human nature.
The witness on the stand gives solemn promise to tell the truth; the officer about to assume place for one year or ten, or for life, pledges his word and oath; the grantor in a deed binds himself for all time by record; churches, societies, universities, accept funds on