power has a right to impose; that the attempt of one class to prescribe the law, the religion, the morals, or the trade of another is both unjust and harmful,--and the Wycliffe and Jefferson of history mean this if they mean anything,--then, when in 1867, Parliament doubled the English
franchise, Robert Lowe
was right in affirming, amid the cheers of the House
, “Now the first interest and duty of every Englishman is to educate the masses — our masters.”
Then, whoever sees farther than his neighbor is that neighbor's servant to lift him to such higher level.
Then, power, ability, influence, character, virtue, are only trusts with which to serve our time.
We all agree in the duty of scholars to help those less favored in life, and that this duty of scholars to educate the mass is still more imperative in a republic, since a republic trusts the State
wholly to the intelligence and moral sense of the people.
The experience of the last forty years shows every man that law has no atom of strength, either in Boston
or New Orleans, unless, and only so far as, public opinion indorses it, and that your life, goods, and good name rest on the moral sense, self-respect, and law-abiding mood of the men that walk the streets, and hardly a whit on the provisions of the statute-book.
Come, any one of you, outside of the ranks of popular men, and you will not fail to find it so. Easy men dream that we live under a government of law. Absurd mistake!
we live under a government of men and newspapers.
Your first attempt to stem dominant and keenly-cherished opinions will reveal this to you.
But what is education?
Of course it is not book-learning.
Book-learning does not make five per cent of that mass of common-sense that “runs” the world, transacts its business, secures its progress, trebles its