level of property qualification for a vote would have saved those stains.
In those cases Judas
did not come from the unlearned class.
Grown gray over history, Macaulay
prophesied twenty years ago that soon in these States the poor, worse than another inroad of Goths and Vandals, would begin a general plunder of the rich.
It is enough to say that our national funds sell as well in Europe
as English consols; and the universal-suffrage Union can borrow money as cheaply as Great Britain
, ruled, one half by Tories, and the other half by men not certain that they dare call themselves Whigs.
Some men affected to scoff at democracy as no sound basis for national debt, doubting the payment of ours.
not only wonders at its rapid payment, but the only taint of fraud that touches even the hem of our garment is the fraud of the capitalist cunningly adding to its burdens, and increasing unfairly the value of his bonds; not the first hint from the people of repudiating an iota even of its unjust additions.
Yet the poor and the unlearned class is the one they propose to punish by disfranchisement.
No wonder the humbler class looks on the whole scene with alarm.
They see their dearest right in peril.
When the easy class conspires to steal, what wonder the humbler class draws together to defend itself?
True, universal suffrage is a terrible power; and with all the great cities brought into subjection to the dangerous classes by grog, and Congress sitting to register the decrees of capital, both sides may well dread the next move.
Experience proves that popular governments are the best protectors of life and property.
But suppose they were not, Bancroft
allows that “the fears of one class are no measure of the rights of another.”
Suppose that universal suffrage endangered peace and