says he was a demagogue.
Fie on Wellington
, and Brougham
, to be fooled and ruled by a demagogue!
What must they, the subjects, be, if O'Connell
, their king, be only a bigot and a demagogue?
A demagogue rides the storm; he has never really the ability to create one.
He uses it narrowly, ignorantly, and for selfish ends.
If not crushed by the force which, without his will, has flung him into power, he leads it with ridiculous miscalculation against some insurmountable obstacle that scatters it forever.
Dying, he leaves no mark on the elements with which he has been mixed.
Robespierre will serve for an illustration.
It took O'Connell
thirty years of patient and sagacious labor to mould elements whose existence no man, however wise, had ever discerned before.
He used them unselfishly, only to break the yoke of his race.
Nearly fifty years have passed since his triumph, but his impress still stands forth clear and sharp on the empire's policy.
is wholly indebted to him for her political education.
Responsibility educates; he lifted her to broader responsibilities.
Her possession of power makes it the keen interest of other classes to see she is well informed.
He associated her with all the reform movements of Great Britain
This is the education of affairs, broader, deeper, and more real than what school or college can give.
This and power, his gifts, are the lever which lifts her to every other right and privilege.
How much England
owes him we can never know; since how great a danger and curse Ireland
would have been to the empire had she continued the cancer Pitt
left her is a chapter of history which, fortunately, can never be written.
No demagogue ever walked through the streets of Dublin
, as O'Connell
did more than once, hooted and mobbed because they opposed