previous next
[503] ‘This meeting will not satisfy the South—it will not even mitigate their anger. Nothing will suit them but an open advocacy of perpetual slavery, and the suppression of anti-slavery publications by penal enactments.1 So, Bostonians, you have disgraced yourselves in vain, and will receive in exchange for your servility an abundance of kicks, cuffs, and curses—from your chivalrous brethren at the South.’ ‘As to the Mayor of Boston, in presiding at this liberty-hating meeting, we shall have something to say about his consistency and impartiality.’

In the same number, Mr. Garrison defended George Thompson by an extended parallel between his mission and methods and Lafayette's; and again, in an article headed ‘Forbearance of the Abolitionists,’ considered the causes, which would justify their rising in defence of their rights:

Utterly deprived of that protection and of those immunities2 which belong to them as citizens, and given up to be the prey of ruffians and assassins, the popular theory of self-defence and the example of worldly patriotism in all ages authorize them to resist unto blood—to proclaim a war of extermination—to light up the fires of a new revolution—and to rally together upon the “tented field,” armed and equipped for mortal combat. As a body, moreover, they are numerous. In physical strength and courage, as well as moral, they are powerful. The causes which induced our revolutionary fathers to rush to the strife of blood, were as dust in the balance, compared with the anguish, outrage and peril to which abolitionists are subjected.

Now, then, in view of this epitome of facts, let the inquiry be made, How have the abolitionists behaved under all these provocations, and exposed to all imaginable suffering? Have they, in a single instance, returned evil for evil? Who,

1 Instantly confirmed by the comments of the Richmond papers on the meeting (Lib. 5.146). Thus, the Whig, of Aug. 27: ‘The people of the North must go to hanging these fanatical wretches if they would not lose the benefit of Southern trade; and they will do it.’ The Enquirer declared that the failure of Northern legislatures to restrain abolitionists from acts of aggression would be regarded as acquiescence, and the South would take decisive measures of defence, beginning with no fellowship, social or political.

2 Lib. 5.139.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Places (automatically extracted)

View a map of the most frequently mentioned places in this document.

Download Pleiades ancient places geospacial dataset for this text.

hide People (automatically extracted)
Sort people alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a person to search for him/her in this document.
Lib (2)
George Thompson (1)
Somebody Garrison (1)
hide Dates (automatically extracted)
Sort dates alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a date to search for it in this document.
August 27th (1)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: