Four weeks later, under the head of ‘Advice to Advisers,’ he made this further announcement:
‘The Editor of the Journal will receive advice gratuitously1 upon subjects relating to law, physic, and divinity—upon the best mode of fattening swine, and raising good crops of potatoes and turnips; but he begs leave most respectfully to decline any instruction as to the manner in which this paper should be conducted.
If he were to gratify the different tastes, and adopt the different views of those few censors who presume to think that they best understand the duties of an editor, it is not probable that the public would be better satisfied with the result; and it is certain that every scrutator must have his separate sheet, embodying his separate notions.
It is desirable that the motto of this paper should receive more attention, as it has not been hastily adopted, and will not be abandoned.’
He could not repress, at the outset, an expression of his regret that for the first six weeks the exigencies of the Presidential campaign would require him to devote so much space to politics, to the exclusion of other themes that were becoming dear to his heart; and it took the form of an apology, as if his readers must also regret the necessity:
‘We have dipped rather deeply into politics, this week,’ he2 wrote, ‘and must continue to do so a few weeks longer.
The crisis which determines an event of greater magnitude and solemnity than has agitated this country since the formation of the Constitution, is rapidly approximating to a close; and it is proper that the people should read, reflect and inquire, before they give their final great decision.
When the election is over, our literary and moral departments will exhibit a fulness and excellence commensurate to their importance.’
His promise with reference to the political course of the paper was faithfully kept, and the gentlemen who had invited him to come and vindicate Bennington
and the State
from the imputation of Jacksonism had no reason to complain of the heartiness with which he advocated the claims of Mr. Adams
, or the vigor with which he denounced General Jackson
and his followers.
's high-handed and arbitrary acts in Louisiana