is opposed to its sentiments can say that he has been denied a hearing in its columns.
If I have taught the American press anything, it is this—the duty of allowing both sides of every question to be impartially canvassed.
To the unknown friends who have contributed to the presentation of this testimonial to me, I return my heartfelt thanks, and assure them that I intend to be an abolitionist till “time shall be no longer.”
The period may have been when I was of some consequence to the anti-slavery movement; but it is not so now. The cause is safe in the hands of its friends.
I owe so much to them all —so much to this dear friend [Mr. Phillips], and to you [Mr. Quincy], and to others whose names I need not call, that it is impossible for me fully to express it. (Cheers.)
As to what I have done abroad in my three missions to England, let me make a clean bosom of the matter.
Had it not been for George Thompson (cheers), those missions would have been measurably unproductive and unimportant.
He has just spoken of what I did in England.
But I declare that he was everything to me—right hand and left hand, soul and body.
He made my pathway smooth and pleasant, and labored far more abundantly and efficiently than I did, and therefore deserves the credit.
's remarks, which followed, were mingled of the ‘mirth and profound emotion’ that1
characterized the occasion.
Our single extract must be from the more serious portion:
John Foster used to say, that the best test of a book's value2 was the mood of mind in which one rose from it. To this trial I am always willing the most eager foe should subject the Liberator. I appeal to each one here, whether he ever leaves its columns without feeling his coldness rebuked, his selfishness shamed, his hand strengthened for every good purpose; without feeling lifted, for awhile, from his ordinary life, and made to hold communion with purer thoughts and loftier aims; and without being moved—the coldest of us—for a moment, at least, with an ardent wish that we, too, may be privileged to be co-workers with God in the noble purposes for our brother's welfare which have been unfolded and pressed on our attention?
Let critics who have time settle, after leisurely analysis, the various faults which, as they think, have marred our friend's