and successes;” and God forbid that those who have every motive of sympathy and interest to act in concert should ever become the prey of petty bickerings among themselves!
In a similar spirit he wrote, in 1812:—
De Witt Clinton, I fear, will be the advocate for State sovereignty and State supremacy more than any President we have yet had. If so, and he should be President from March 3, 1813, to March 3, 1817, we shall be far advanced on the road to confusion by the time his administration expires.
The Federal party seems to be disposed to erect New England into a separate government.
But where would be the boundaries of this fragment of our continent?
What will be the benefit of a separation?
Would not this fragment soon be split into other fragments; and if the process of separation is begun, where will it end?
's public efforts belong to the least interesting period of American literature, the first quarter of the present century.
It followed the generation which was illustrated by the orators and writers of the Revolution, and the authors of the ‘Federalist;’ and it preceded the demonstration of Mr. Webster
's marvellous forensic powers.
It was an interval in which political speeches and writings showed little originality of thought, depth of feeling, or terseness and vigor of expression.
There was a manifest effort to use words of Latin derivation, and to elaborate lengthened and swelling periods, after the style of Johnson
Letter-writing, too, had the same defects.
The correspondence of friends had the stateliness of a page of history.
enjoyed the confidence of his party.
He was chosen Clerk of the House of Representatives of Massachusetts
, for the years 1806-7, and 1810-11.
The last two years he was associated with his college friend, Joseph Story, who was the Speaker
Story, on resigning the office, soon after his appointment as Judge
of the Supreme Court of the United States
, wrote him a letter, stating it to be his last official act, and expressing his ‘perfect conviction of the ability, the correctness, and impartiality with which you have discharged the important duties of your office.’
In 1808, he desired Mr. Sumner
to become the editor of a Republican newspaper in Boston
, and pressed his excellent qualifications for the position.
In 1815, Mr. Sumner
urged Judge Story
to deliver a series of law lectures in Boston
, but the judge declined, for the reason that the Royall Professorship
was about to be established at Cambridge
, and a course,