the court published in the Reports. This ground is strongly upheld by Ingersoll, Peters' counsel at Philadelphia, in a printed argument, which I have read. John Sergeant is Peters' counsel, and Webster, Wheaton's.1 Franklin Dexter made an argument here a few days before I came, which gained him a good reputation. The court this morning gave judgment for his side.2 At this moment, Isaac Hill has moved both Senators and spectators from their seats by undertaking a written speech about the deposits. The Senate do not listen; but the public, whom he will reach through the press, will listen. Every day's attendance in the political part of the Capitol shows me clearly that all speeches there are delivered to the people beyond, and not to the Senators or Representatives present. In the Supreme Court, the object of speaking is to convince. The more I see of politics the more I learn to love law. Signs of the deep distress of the country are received every day and proclaimed in both Houses. Jackson is obdurate. Sanguine hopes are entertained that he will soon be in a minority in the House, as he is in the Senate. Judge Story has shown me immense kindness. He sends his love to you. He has just come to me from the bench, and tells me to inform you that he is tired. You will sympathize, I have no doubt, with the fatigue of a wordy argument. My love to Mrs. Greenleaf, and hope your son is well of that cough. Yours, as ever, affectionately,
To his parents.Washington, March 3, 1834.my dear parents,—Since last I wrote, I have seen many great men and attended at the Capitol every day, making the Supreme Court (which is on the lower floor, in a dark room, almost down cellar) my first object of attention, the Senate my next, and the House of Representatives my last. There have not been many cases of interest in the Supreme Court, either from the talents displayed by the counsel or the character of the questions raised. The best argument I have heard as yet was by our Charles G. Loring. You, father, may here see the vanity of my journey in travelling so many hundred miles at such cost, and living here at such cost, to confess that the best treat I have as yet had in the Supreme Court, to attend which was the main object of my visit, was from a home lawyer.3 . . .
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
Chapter 2 : Parentage and Family.���the father.
Chapter 3 : birth and early Education.��� 1811 - 26 .
Chapter 4 : College Life.��� September , 1826 , to September , 1830 .���age, 15 - 19 .
Chapter 5 : year after College.��� September , 1830 , to September , 1831 .���Age, 19 - 20 .
Chapter 6 : Law School .��� September , 1831 , to December , 1833 .���Age, 20 - 22 .
Chapter 7 : study in a law office .���Visit to Washington .��� January , 1854 , to September , 1834 .���Age, 23 .
Chapter 8 : early professional life.��� September , 1834 , to December , 1837 .���Age, 23 - 26 .
Chapter 9 : going to Europe .��� December , 1837 .���Age, 26 .
Chapter 10 : the voyage and Arrival.��� December , 1837 , to January , 1838 ��� age, 26 - 27 .
Chapter 11 : Paris .���its schools.��� January and February , 1838 .���Age, 27 .
Chapter 12 : Paris .���Society and the courts.��� March to May , 1838 .���Age, 27 .
Chapter 13 : England .��� June , 1838 , to March , 1839 .���Age, 27 - 28 .
Chapter 14 : first weeks in London .��� June and July , 1838 .���Age, 27 .
Chapter 15 : the Circuits .���Visits in England and Scotland .��� August to October , 1838 .���age, 27 .
1 The brief of Mr. Webster's argument in Wheaton v. Peters, 8 Peters' Reports, p. 591, was taken by Mr. Peters, the reporter, from Sumner's notes, made during the argument. Mr. Peters prevailed in the case.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.