practically ended the discussion, and no subsequent effort was made in Massachusetts
to enlist public sentiment in behalf of the Pennsylvania
The controversy did not disturb the personal relations of Sumner
, and the latter's pamphlet was the occasion of friendly correspondence between them.1
The debate had been followed by European
penologists, particularly by those who had officially visited the American
from his chateau in Normandy
, August 6, a letter in which he expressed his surprise and regret that the Society, which had made him a member, and which enjoyed a European reputation, had refused to adopt resolutions which, while disclaiming the advocacy of the Auburn or of any other system, committed it to the impartial study and treatment of all systems.
Regretting that it had become the champion of the Auburn system, and the systematic adversary of the separate system, he said:—
I need not inform you that at the present day in Europe discussion and experience have, on the contrary, led almost all persons of intelligence to adopt the separate system, and to reject the Auburn system.
Most of the governments of the Old World have declared themselves more or less in this way, not hastily, but after serious inquiry and long debate.2
, in his reply, September 15, wrote:—
The discussions which have recently taken place in Boston on the subject of prison discipline have been the means of diffusing much information and awakening an interest which will be productive of good.
Everything relating to it is now read with avidity.
the government of our Society is in the hands of a few persons who are strongly prejudiced against change.
I think, however, that its course will now be altered.
Mr. Dwight, the secretary, has become insane,—whether incurably so, I do not know.
The New York Society promises great usefulness. . . .I cherish a lively recollection of my brief intercourse with you in Paris.
An international prison congress was held this year at Brussels
, in letters from Europe
, was urged to attend, but was unable to do so. His brother George, however, was present, and acquitted himself well in the debates, showing in