of his species.
He was a philanthropist, no less than a philosopher,--a lover of his race.
Truly was it said of him, at the time of his decease, by one who knew him well-“There was one thing which he thought most
needful for us, and for all men to learn and study; and another, which of all things he deemed the most important to accomplish or to strive after.
If we sum up all that he taught us of the harmony and variety of our physical organization, of the temperaments, the animal, intellectual, and moral faculties, was not all this instruction given for a single object to teach us, or rather, induce us to study, the nature of man
And if we think over all he taught of education, of natural morality and religion, we find that the practical end of all his inquiries was the improvement
and happiness of man
From the same authority we learn that, being asked what peculiar effect he thought his system had had on his own mind-he said, that without it he would have been a misanthrope; that the knowledge of human nature had taught him to love, respect and pity his fellow-beings.
Those, adds this writer, who attended his lectures will never forget how his countenance was lighted up with joy whenever he spoke of a trait of kindness evinced by any being, whether he was looking up at the noble head of Oberlin
, or pointing at the skull of a little dog that had been remarkable for his kindly disposition; and how the light of his countenance suddenly changed into darkness, and his voice almost failed him, when with averted looks and hand he pointed at the portrait of the man who murdered his own mother.
That this kindliness was eminently characteristic of