confidence, his sanctum, and his iron safe.
He has not the least objection to tell the public the number of his subscribers, the amount of his receipts, the excess of his receipts over his expenditures, or the excess of his expenditures over his receipts.
Accordingly, the whole history of the New Yorker, and the story of its editor's joys and sorrows, his trials and his triumphs, lie plainly and fully written in the New Yorker itself.
The New Yorker was, incomparably, the best newspaper of its kind that had ever been published in this country.
It was printed, at first, upon a large folio sheet; afterwards, in two forms, folio and quarto, the former at two dollars a year, the latter at three.
Its contents were of four kinds; literary matter, selected from home and foreign periodicals, and well selected; editorial articles by the editor, vigorously and courteously expressed; news, chiefly political, compiled with an accuracy new to American journalism; city, literary, and miscellaneous paragraphs.
The paper took no side in politics, though the ardent convictions of the editor were occasionally manifest, in spite of himself.
The heat and fury of some of his later writings never characterize the essays of the New Yorker.
He was always gentle, however strong and decided; and there was a modesty and candor in his manner of writing that made the subscriber a friend.
For example, in the very first number, announcing the publication of certain mathematical books, he says, ‘As we are not ourselves conversant with the higher branches of mathematics, we cannot pretend to speak authoritatively upon the merits of these publications’—a kind of avowal which omniscient editors are not prone to make.
A paper, that lived long, never stole into existence more quietly than the New Yorker. Fifteen of the personal friends of the editors had promised to become subscribers; and when, on the 22d of March, 1834, the first number appeared, it sold to the extent of one hundred copies.
Neither of the proprietors had any reputation with the public; all of them were very young, and the editor evidently supposed that it was only necessary to make a good paper in order to sell a great many copies.
The ‘Publishers’ Address, “ indeed, expressly said:—
There is one disadvantage attending our debut which is seldom encountered