I have made the unfortunate Dunbar
the text for a diatribe on the subject of descriptive poetry, because I find that this old ghost is not laid yet, but comes back like a vampire to suck the life out of a true enjoyment of poetry,—and the medicine by which vampires were cured was to unbury them, drive a stake through them, and get them under ground again with all despatch.
The first duty of the Muse is to be delightful, and it is an injury done to all of us when we are put in the wrong by a kind of statutory affirmation on the part of the critics of something to which our judgment will not consent, and from which our taste revolts.
A collection of poets is commonly made up, nine parts in ten, of this perfunctory verse-making, and I never look at one without regretting that we have lost that excellent Latin phrase, Corpus poetarum
. In fancy I always read it on the backs of the volumes,—a body
of poets, indeed, with scarce one soul to a hundred of them.
One genuine English poet illustrated the early years of the sixteenth century,—John Skelton
He had vivacity, fancy, humor, and originality.
Gleams of the truest poetical sensibility alternate in him with an almost brutal coarseness.
He was truly Rabelaisian before Rabelais
But there is a freedom and hilarity in much of his writing that gives it a singular attraction.
A breath of cheerfulness runs along the slender stream of his verse, under which it seems to ripple and crinkle, catching and casting back the sunshine like a stream blown on by clear western winds.
was an exceptional blossom of autumn.
A long and dreary winter follows.
, who brought back with him from Italy
the blank-verse not long before introduced by Trissino, is to some extent another exception.
He had the sentiment of nature and unhackneyed feeling, but he has no mastery of verse, nor any elegance