if we may believe the old song, the stars ‘had nothing else to do,’ though their chance of shining in the middle of a London November may perhaps be reckoned very doubtful.
An author should consider how largely the art of writing consists in knowing what to leave in the inkstand.
's volumes contain a great deal of very valuable matter, whatever one may think of its bearing upon the life of Milton
The chapters devoted to Scottish affairs are particularly interesting to a student of the Great Rebellion, its causes and concomitants.
His analyses of the two armies, of the Parliament, and the Westminster Assembly, are sensible additions to our knowledge.
A too painful thoroughness, indeed, is the criticism we should make on his work as a biography.
Even as a history, the reader might complain that it confuses by the multiplicity of its details, while it wearies by want of continuity.
lacks the skill of an accomplished story-teller.
A fact is to him a fact, never mind how unessential, and he misses the breadth of truth in his devotion to accuracy.
The very order of his title-page, ‘The Life of Milton
, narrated in Connection with the Political, Ecclesiastical, and Literary History
of his Time,’ shows, it should seem, a misconception of the true nature of his subject.
's chief importance, it might be fairly said his only importance, is a literary one.
His place is fixed as the most classical of our poets.
Neither in politics, theology, nor social ethics, did Milton
leave any distinguishable trace on the thought of his time or in the history of opinion.
In both these lines of his activity circumstances forced upon him the position of a controversialist whose aims and results are by the necessity of the case desultory and ephemeral.
before him and Hobbes
after him had a far firmer grasp of fundamental principles than he. His studies in