Rocks, caves, lakes, fens, bogs, dens and shapes of death,
which might he cited to illustrate Pope
And ten low words oft creep in one dull line.
cannot certainly be taxed with any partiality for low words.
He rather loved them tall, as the Prussian King
loved men to be six feet high in their stockings, and fit to go into the grenadiers.
He loved them as much for their music as for their meaning,— perhaps more.
His style, therefore, when it has to deal with commoner things, is apt to grow a little cumbrous and unwieldy.
A Persian poet says that when the owl would boast he boasts of catching mice at the edge of a hole.
would have understood this.
would have made him talk like an eagle.
His influence is not to be left out of account as partially contributing to that decline toward poetic diction which was already beginning ere he died.
If it would not be fair to say that he is the most artistic, he may be called in the highest sense the most scientific of our poets.
If to Spenser
younger poets have gone to be sung-to, they have sat at the feet of Milton
to be taught.
Our language has no finer poem than ‘Samson Agonistes
,’ if any so fine in the quality of austere dignity or in the skill with which the poet's personal experience is generalized into a classic tragedy.
Gentle as Milton
's earlier portraits would seem to show him, he had in him by nature, or bred into him by fate, something of the haughty and defiant selfasser-tion of Dante
and Michel Angelo
In no other English author is the man so large a part of his works.
's haughty conception of himself enters into all he says and does.
Always the necessity of this one man became that of the whole human race for the moment.
There were no walls so sacred but must go to the ground when